Apportionment: Does your damages expert understand this legal concept?
$225.00
Description
Abstract: In Niazi Licensing, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit excluded the testimony of a damages expert on the proper royalty rate for an infringed method patent. This article summarizes the case and explains where the expert went wrong. Niazi Licensing Corp. v. St. Jude Medical S.C., Inc., No. 21-1864 (Fed. Cir. April 11, 2022).
Additional information
| Year | |
|---|---|
| Niche | |
| Newsletter | |
| Issue | |
| Word Count |